Telegram and MAX channels, communities, brand media — we grow them with paid traffic from every source at once. We count not subscriptions, but those who are still there a month later, and how much money the base brought
30 minutes on your numbers: cost per subscriber by source, churn and payback of the base. For projects with a budget from $5,000 per month
A cheap subscription without warm-up does not pay back. We count NET — those still there after 7 and 30 days — and optimize for them.
Without tagging all subscribers look the same. We set up attribution: every subscriber is tied to a campaign and creative.
The audience was acquired for the wrong product. We look at revenue per cohort and cut the sources that bring viewers instead of buyers.
Industry, building materials, B2B — we have grown those too. What decides is not the budget, but the angle and the right source.
Case studies where we counted retention and money from the base, not subscriptions
Traffic from three platforms to our own pre-landers, an invite link for every combo — the subscription is stitched to the payment in the CRM. It became clear which channel brings revenue, not subscribers
Online school of digital products · Telegram
10 hypotheses a week: about 500 ads and 150 targeting variants. Combos burned out in weeks — a continuous search for new ones held the cost per subscriber and closed the KPI on time
profeat.team · brand media
A subscriber at $1.64 from YouTube via Google Ads — the base paid back in the first month: every new budget cycle is funded by the income of the previous one
Telegram channel · traffic from YouTube
Every “channel → campaign” combo gets its own invite link: without it the subscription is anonymous. That is how the school with a Telegram channel saw which platform brings revenue, not subscribers.
Our own warm-up page between the ad and the subscription: the subscriber is more expensive, but stays and reads — while churn from a direct link eats up all the savings on price.
We measure those still there after 7 and 30 days and reconcile cohorts with sales. Sources that bring viewers instead of buyers get switched off — even if the subscription is cheaper there.
Combos burn out in weeks. For the brand media profeat.team the “10 hypotheses a week” rule — about 500 ads and 150 targeting variants — closed the 46,000-subscriber KPI on time.
Come with your current cost per subscriber — leave with a calculation of the cost and churn at which the base pays back, and which sources to test first. Free, no obligations
No. Telegram and MAX channels, communities, brand media and subscriber bases — the mechanics are the same: traffic from external sources with attribution and retention tracking.
We guarantee transparency: you see the cost per NET subscriber for every source. Promising “10,000 in a month” without data on the niche is deception.
Almost always yes. A direct link from the ad gives a cheap subscription and high churn, a warm-up page — the opposite.
From $5,000 per month. Below that, source tests stretch out, and the cost per NET subscriber does not collect enough statistics for decisions.
It depends on monetization: in the documented case of selling through the channel the base paid back 125% in the first month, for the school with a long funnel — over the distance, but at 669% ROMI.
We’ll get in touch within two hours to ask questions and discuss how we can help
Specify the category
Enter your name
By clicking the button you agree to the privacy policy and data processing
The minimum ad budget to work with us is $5,000/month: below that threshold source tests do not collect enough statistics, and there is nothing to optimize growth on. Message us when the budget grows — we will review it then.
Opening the calendar — pick a convenient time for a 30-minute call. If the window did not open, message us on Telegram.
The network or server did not respond. Reach us directly — your answers are already prefilled in the message.