We take the subscriber not to the counter in the channel, but to payment. Traffic goes to our own pre-lander, every combo gets its own invite link, subscriptions and CRM money come together in one report.
Meta cannot measure a conversion inside the messenger: the “subscribed” event never reaches the ad account, there is nothing to optimize for. We lead to our own pre-lander with a pixel — the algorithm gets a signal, and the person sees what they are subscribing to.
Inside Telegram you cannot see which campaign the person came from. Without tagging all combos are compared by cost per subscription — and the winner is the one that brings the cheapest and least paying people.
In our two-year project a subscription cost $2.48 to $4.07 depending on the platform, and that was not what decided: a 1.6% subscriber-to-payment conversion at a $1,281 ticket — that is what the price ceiling is calculated from.
Several versions on our own servers: what the channel is, what the person gets, a join button. We build it ourselves — it is a separate agency service, not outsourced.
A separate invite link for every “campaign → creative” pair. The only way to tie a subscription to an ad; without it end-to-end analytics cannot be built at all.
The pixel natively in the <head>, events duplicated server-side with deduplication. Clean signals — the algorithm learns from subscriptions, not clicks.
We subtract organic growth and unsubscribes. The Meta ad account’s own subscription counters are not the source of truth — we reconcile with external tracking.
Platform spend in dollars at the daily rate, subscriptions by invite link, CRM deals — in a daily dashboard. That is how you see which combo brings paying people.
A combo lives 7–14 days. We keep a flow of hypotheses: we test messages and scale a theme, not a single ad.
| $2.85 | per subscription from Meta Ads | Took Telegram subscribers all the way to payments — 669% ROMI over two years |
| $3.09 | per subscription on average across three platforms | |
| 1.6% | subscriber-to-payment conversion | |
| $1,281 | average ticket — 1,581 deals | |
| 15% | marketing share of the ticket — headroom for scaling |
Technically yes, but the algorithm has nothing to optimize for: the subscription event inside the messenger never returns to the ad account. We lead to our own pre-lander with a pixel and a link into the channel — that gives both a signal for optimization and source tagging.
By Telegram invite links: every “campaign → creative” combo gets its own link. We subtract organic growth and unsubscribes — the report shows net.
In our largest project — from $2.48 (Google Ads) to $2.85 (Meta). The price depends on geo, language and how narrow the channel’s topic is.
No: Meta does not sell impressions in Russia. For a Russian-speaking audience we work through geos outside Russia — Europe, the CIS, Israel, the UAE, the USA.
From $5,000/month for traffic. Below that the algorithm does not get enough subscription volume to exit the learning phase, and tests stretch over months.
We’ll get in touch within two hours to ask questions and discuss how we can help